Multiple Choice
On June 1, Lauto Inc contractually agreed to buy a Pupmobile LX from Dos Motors Ltd for $25 000.Payment of the price and delivery of an appropriate vehicle were scheduled to occur on July 15.On July 1, however, Dos informed Lauto that it had carelessly crushed its only Pupmobile LX with an industrial-sized garbage bin.Dos apologized profusely and explained that it did not have another one in stock.It also informed Lauto that, because a Pupmobile LX had recently appeared in a highly successful movie, such cars were in great demand."If you still want one," said the manager at Dos, "you had better act quickly.I'll expect that they will start to go up in value very quickly." Between July 1 and July 10, Lauto could have agreed to purchase a Pupmobile LX from another dealer for $30 000.Nevertheless, Lauto waited until July 11 before buying a Pupmobile LX from Tertius Motors Ltd for $35 000.By July 15, the market value of such vehicles had increased to $40 000.A court would probably order Dos to pay Lauto
A) $15 000.
B) $10 000.
C) $25 000.
D) $5000.
E) $30 000.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q65: A distinction is often drawn between cost
Q66: "The idea of compensation usually means that
Q67: Iago contractually agreed to sell a particular
Q68: On March 1, Joe contractually agreed to
Q69: When will punitive damages be available for
Q70: Imran contractually agreed to sell a widget
Q72: On August 1, Brian contractually agreed to
Q73: "Reliance damages cannot be used to escape
Q74: The concept of remoteness<br>A)allows recovery for losses
Q75: What are nominal damages? Why is it