Essay
Lalene agreed to purchase a specific vehicle from Ritooria Motors.Under the terms of that contract, Lalene immediately provided a cheque for $10 000 and promised to pay another $15 000 within one year.Ritooria promised to prepare the car for delivery within one week (by installing a CD player and adding new tires) and to call Lalene when the work was done.Ritooria cashed the cheque the next day and prepared the car as promised within one week.Before it contacted Lalene, however, the car was struck by lightning and completely destroyed.Unfortunately, neither party had insurance on the car.Ritooria insists that it is still entitled to receive another $15 000 from Lalene.She, in contrast, insists that she is entitled to a refund of the $10 000 that she previously paid.Which party is probably correct? Explain your answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Lalene is probably correct.The contract ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q30: Helene operates a beauty salon.She cut Bentley's
Q31: Myla became violently ill after eating a
Q32: Naima ordered 100 spools of string from
Q33: Although the Sale of Goods Act does
Q34: Juan bought a lawn mower at Raija's
Q36: The phrase nemo dat quod non habet
Q37: Kasper bought a truckload of gravel from
Q38: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)The
Q39: The Sale of Goods Act may apply
Q40: Which of the following transactions falls OUTSIDE