Multiple Choice
What was the reason for the decision in the case of Van Den Esschert v Chappell [1960] WAR 114?
A) The seller's oral statement was regarded as collateral.
B) The seller's oral statement was inconsistent with the terms of the written agreement.
C) The seller's oral statement was truthful.
D) The seller's oral statement was ambiguous.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Which of the following is NOT one
Q27: Why was the council held to be
Q28: A term in a contract which relieves
Q29: Why was the plaintiff successful in the
Q30: Why did the court imply a term
Q32: Which of the following statements is the
Q33: Which of the following is NOT an
Q34: In the case of a written contract,the
Q35: Which of the following is NOT an
Q36: If a collateral contract is inconsistent with