Multiple Choice
Why was the plaintiff bound by the exclusion clause in the case of: L'Estrange v Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394?
A) Because the clause applied to the damage that occurred.
B) Because the clause was explained to them.
C) Because the clause was contained in a written document signed by the plaintiff.
D) Because of previous dealings between the parties.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: In order for a party to rely
Q6: What was the reason for the decision
Q7: Which of the following is NOT a
Q8: Which of the following is NOT a
Q9: Where there is an oral contract,it is
Q11: The Australian Consumer Law creates guarantees that
Q12: When is a particular statement more likely
Q13: In which of the following cases did
Q14: In order to establish that a collateral
Q15: Which of the following statements is the