The Case of Hadley V Baxendale (1854)9 Ex 341 Is

Multiple Choice

The case of Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341 is authority for the principle that breach of contract entitles a plaintiff to:

A) damages which are a natural consequence of the breach or expressly bought to the attention of the defendant.
B) damages that are a reasonably direct consequence of the breach of contract.
C) damages that are reasonably foreseeable based on the actual or constructive knowledge of the defendant.
D) all of the above.