Multiple Choice
Why was claim for damages caused by contaminated mink food unsuccessful in the case of: Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd [1972] AC 441?
A) The food had been made to the plaintiff's specifications.
B) The food still conformed to its description in spite of the contamination.
C) The defendant's were not responsible for the contamination.
D) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: Which of the following is NOT a
Q7: Do you consider that the remedies now
Q8: Under the ACL,a consumer has the option
Q9: Which of the following is NOT a
Q10: The legal obligation to ensure that spare
Q12: In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936]
Q13: Under the Australian Consumer Law goods supplied
Q14: In some cases the liability of a
Q15: The guarantee of fitness for purpose applies
Q16: If the supplier of goods fails to