Multiple Choice
What was the reason for the decision of the court in the case of Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44?
A) The worker did not provide labour that required qualifications or skill.
B) The worker could not refuse work.
C) The worker was required to wear the company uniform and was presented as a representative of the company.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: Common law does not apply to the
Q41: With respect to casual contracts,an employer:<br>A)is obliged
Q42: An employer may dismiss an employee without
Q43: The duty of an employer to ensure
Q44: When will an employee NOT be covered
Q46: Which of the following is NOT a
Q47: Which of the following journeys are considered
Q48: Briefly explain how equal opportunity in the
Q49: Where unsafe work conditions are created in
Q50: The Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011