Multiple Choice
In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85,the manufacturer:
A) was liable to the customer based on criminal law.
B) was not liable to the customer for breach of an implied term in the contract.
C) was not liable because the customer had the opportunity to inspect the product.
D) was liable for breach of duty of care owed to the customer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: In which case did the House of
Q10: A person who suffers injury as a
Q11: In which case did the High Court
Q12: It is easier to take action against
Q13: Since a trespasser is considered uninvited,the occupier
Q15: There are no circumstances upon which an
Q16: A 'non-delegable' duty of care is:<br>A)less onerous
Q17: In what circumstances will an employer be
Q18: To establish a case of occupier's liability,a
Q19: Liability for criminal negligence might arise because:<br>A)the