In the Case of Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball Co

Multiple Choice

In the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.[1893] 1 QB 256,the court decided that the advertisement:

A) Was only an invitation to treat.
B) Contained clear evidence of an intention to create legal relations.
C) Was presumed not to contain an intention to create legal relations.
D) Was nothing more than an advertising puff.