Solved

The Rule in Foakes V Beer Was Not Applied in Hirachand

Question 18

Multiple Choice

The rule in Foakes v Beer was not applied in Hirachand Punamchand v Temple [1911] 2 KB 330 because:

A) the payment was accepted by the creditor.
B) the debt was paid by a third party.
C) the debt was paid with interest.
D) the debt was paid in full.

Related Questions

Q13: To what extent has the doctrine of

Q14: The consideration paid by a party to

Q15: Which of the following is NOT an

Q16: Estoppel was rejected Easts Van Villages v

Q17: The claim for higher wages was successful

Q19: All simple contracts require consideration to be

Q20: In which case did the court decide

Q21: In which of the following cases was

Q22: To establish consideration,the price must be:<br>A)valuable,adequate and

Q23: Which of the following is NOT one