Multiple Choice
The decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1998) 164 CLR 387 is significant because:
A) promissory estoppel was applied where there was no pre-existing contract.
B) promissory estoppel was used to commence an action.
C) promissory estoppel was applied in Australia.
D) all of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Consideration must be present or future,it cannot
Q3: In the context of contract law,'consideration' is
Q4: Estoppel is based on an assumption of
Q5: The rule in Foakes v Beer will
Q6: Estoppel can only be used as a
Q8: When the doctrine of promissory estoppel is
Q9: Valid consideration is NOT established by which
Q10: The case of Foakes v Beer (1884)9
Q11: Only a promise supported by consideration will
Q12: Which of the following is NOT one