Multiple Choice
In Kelo v.City of New London,Conn. ,where the city forced people to sell their houses so there could be a new large project built,the Supreme Court held that the forced sale:
A) was legitimate as long as the city used the property for government purposes
B) violated the takings clause because the largest impact of the action fell on minorities
C) violated the takings clause because property owners were not paid fair market value
D) was legitimate if approved by the federal Department of Housing
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q63: In Katzenback v. McClung, concerning race discrimination
Q93: In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court
Q104: In Northwestern States Portland Cement v. Minnesota,
Q128: As required by Article III of the
Q136: In Reget v.City of La Crosse,the appeals
Q138: In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City
Q139: In Reget v.City of La Crosse case,where
Q258: In practice, the commerce clause of the
Q310: A state law prohibiting anonymous communications on
Q413: Executives working for a corporation accused of