In Reget V

Multiple Choice

In Reget v.City of La Crosse case,where a business owner claims he was selected by the City for bad treatment,Reget needed to establish:

A) that a state actor had intentionally treated him differently than others similarly situated
B) that there was no rational basis for the difference in treatment
C) both that a state actor had intentionally treated him differently than others similarly situated,and that there was no rational basis for the difference in treatment
D) that his property had been searched without a warrant
E) none of the other choices are correct