In Forgie-Buccioni V

Multiple Choice

In Forgie-Buccioni v.Hannaford Brothers,where Forgie-Buccioni was detained in a grocery store's security room after being accused of not paying for Drixoral cold medicine,the appeals court held that:

A) there was a tort of false imprisonment because the defendant's employees did not intend to confine Forgie-Buccioni
B) there was a tort of false imprisonment because the defendant's actions were insulting to the plaintiff
C) there was a tort of false imprisonment because the defendant did not explain what was happening to the plaintiff
D) all of the specific choices
E) none of the other specific choices