In Reynolds V

Multiple Choice

In Reynolds v.Ethicon Endo-Surgery,where Reynolds suffered a miscarriage soon after her employer told her she would be fired if she did not move to another city.She sued for emotional distress and the appeals court held that:

A) she had no claim for emotional distress,but may have one for battery due to suffering the miscarriage caused by the threat by the employer
B) she had no claim for emotional distress because the situation was upsetting,not outrageous
C) she had a claim for emotional distress as her expert witness testified that the situation likely triggered the miscarriage
D) she had a claim for emotional distress,as her expert witness testified that the situation likely triggered the miscarriage;the miscarriage was the basis for the emotional distress
E) none of the other choices