In James V

Multiple Choice

In James v.Bob Ross Buick,where James had been fired from a car dealership that then sent letters to customers under his name,James sued for invasion of privacy and the appeals court held that:

A) he had no case because no harm was done to his reputation
B) he had no case because he was already a "public figure" to the customers
C) he had no case because he could show no damages
D) he had no case because the dealership did not intend to harm his privacy
E) none of the other choices