In James V

Multiple Choice

In James v.Bob Ross Buick,where James had been fired from a car dealership that then sent letters to customers under his name,James sued for invasion of privacy and the appeals court held that:

A) he had no case because no harm was done to his reputation
B) he had no case because he was already a "public figure" to the customers
C) he had a case because his name had been misappropriated for commercial benefit
D) he had a case because the dealership had promised him $2 for every such letter sent but did not pay him
E) none of the other choices