In James V

Multiple Choice

In James v.Bob Ross Buick,where James had been fired from a car dealership that then sent letters to customers under his name,James sued for invasion of privacy and the appeals court held that he had a case because:

A) the Ohio Supreme Court has distinguished between the incidental use of a person's name and likeness from appropriation of the benefits associated with a person's identity
B) the Ohio Supreme Court does not distinguish between the incidental use of a person's name and likeness and the appropriation of the benefits associated with a person's identity
C) there is no difference between a person's signature and a person's picture
D) James has agreed to allow the company to use his picture,but not his name
E) none of the other choices