Multiple Choice
An accounting firm was sued for negligently preparing a financial report for a company. It causes losses to occur. At trial, the firm was found to have been negligent in its work. This meant that the firm would likely be:
A) responsible for losses suffered by its client that could be linked to reliance on the work
B) responsible for losses suffered by its client that could be linked to reliance on that work and to the firm whose books were audited since that firm's reputation was damaged
C) responsible for losses not to exceed $1 million, the statutory limit on accountant liability in that state
D) not responsible for damages despite negligence, since reliance could not be shown
E) not responsible for damages despite negligence because of a lack of proximate cause
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q455: Defenses to a negligent act include:<br>A) assumption
Q456: In Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad, Palsgraf
Q457: On a hot day, you see a
Q458: Erin's employer published a story about her
Q459: Fact Pattern 6-1<br>E-Z Rid disposes of toxic
Q460: In Lawler v. Montblanc North America, where
Q461: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q462: The rules of tort law have changed
Q463: A business can become involved in a
Q464: The three privileges that may be used