In Powell V

Multiple Choice

In Powell v.Washburn,where Powell sued the developer of a planned community he lived in for changing the covenants,conditions,and restrictions (CC&Rs) to allow recreational vehicles as residences in the development,the Arizona high court held that:

A) unless otherwise stated,the developer had the right to change the CC&Rs at any time
B) the developer could change the CC&Rs only if he got permission from a majority of land owners
C) the CC&Rs would be interpreted to promote the general value of property in the development,not the wishes of one property owner
D) the CC&Rs would be interpreted to promote the intent of the legislature of allow flexibility in housing,which means the developer could make the changes he proposed
E) none of the other choices