In Saadala V

Multiple Choice

In Saadala v.East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment,where Saalada sued the Zoning Board after it approved a 7-Eleven's application to extend its non-conforming classification so it could expand its business,the appeals court held that:

A) the Board should not have granted the application because 7-Eleven failed to show "special reasons" required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
B) the Board should have granted the application because 7-Eleven showed the "special reasons" required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
C) the Board should have granted the application because 7-Eleven failed to show "special reasons" required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
D) the Board should not have granted the application because 7-Eleven is too small a corporation to have the "special reasons" to get approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
E) none of the other choices are correct