In Saadala V

Multiple Choice

In Saadala v.East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment,where Saalada sued the Zoning Board after it approved a 7-Eleven's application to extend its non-conforming classification so it could expand its business,the appeals court held that 7-Eleven:

A) did not have enough capital to support the proposed business plan
B) succeeded in showing "special reasons" required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
C) showed that the property in question was uniquely suited to its commercial needs
D) failed to show that it would be able to pay all the taxes associated with the proposed use
E) none of the other choices are correct