Multiple Choice
In Atkinson v.City of Pierre,Atkinson sued the city for not taking action to force an ice-making plant next to her apartment building to make less noise.There were no other complaints from residents near the plant,which contributed to the high court's decision that:
A) the business was not a nuisance
B) the business was a nuisance
C) the business was not a public nuisance,but was a private nuisance
D) Atkinson was being unlawfully bothered by the business
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Unlike in most countries, subsurface mineral rights
Q74: In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman
Q76: David puts his 5,000 acre ranch in
Q218: Which of the following is not real
Q220: Which of the following is an example
Q365: A _ an unreasonable interference with a
Q366: A(n)_ is "an interest in land which
Q367: The government has the power to force
Q368: In Atkinson v.City of Pierre,Atkinson sued an
Q375: If a landlord fails to make timely