In Hicklin Engineering V

Multiple Choice

In Hicklin Engineering v.R.J.Bartell,where Bartell quit working for Hicklin and formed a company that competed with Hicklin,which then sued Bartell for theft of trade secrets,the appeals court held that Hicklin:

A) had no suit since the information involved was not protected knowledge
B) had no suit because Bartell had never been informed that he was privilege to trade secrets
C) showed theft and would collect damages under Wisconsin's Uniform Trade Secrets Act
D) showed theft and would collect treble damages under Wisconsin's Uniform Trade Secrets Act
E) none of the other choices