Multiple Choice
In Hicklin Engineering v.R.J.Bartell,where Bartell quit working for Hicklin and formed a company that competed with Hicklin,which then sued Bartell for theft of trade secrets,the appeals court held that:
A) a reasonable jury could find that Bartell knew that some of the data Hicklin provided him was considered trade secrets
B) a reasonable jury could not find that Bartell knew that some of the data Hicklin provided him was considered trade secrets
C) a reasonable jury could find that Hicklin knew that some of the data Bartell provided was considered trade secrets
D) a reasonable jury could find that Bartell knew that some of the data Hicklin provided him was patented
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: Fair use allows small volume copying of
Q58: In Audi AG v. D'Amato, where Audi
Q128: Dilution means a seller causes confusion about
Q135: Patents cases are usually reviewed by the
Q172: Which of the following is an example
Q247: Intellectual property is also called tangible property.
Q254: Which of the following is part of
Q262: Which of the following is true of
Q337: If you create a new statute, you
Q395: When a work has a copyright from