In Weyerhaeuser V

Multiple Choice

In Weyerhaeuser v.Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber,where Weyerhaeuser was accused of predatory bidding for raw timber to drive out a competitor,the Supreme Court held Weyerhaeuser was:

A) not guilty because predatory bidding does not the violate Robinson-Patman Act,predatory pricing does
B) not guilty as there was no evidence it used its bidding power to raise output prices
C) guilty as its market share increased to 65 percent,which was evidence of monopolistic impact
D) guilty as it raised prices of output after it drove out the competition by buying most of the inputs
E) none of the other choices