Multiple Choice
An AP atlas and axis projection with poor positioning demonstrates the upper incisors about 1 inch (2.5 cm) inferior to the posterior occiput, obscuring the dens and atlantoaxial joint. How was the positioning setup mispositioned for such a projection to be obtained?
1) The patient's face was rotated toward the left side.
2) The acanthiomeatal line was perpendicular to the IR, and the central ray was perpendicular.
3) The patient's chin was tucked more than needed.
4) An imaginary line connecting the occlusal plane and posterior occiput's inferior edge was not aligned perpendicular to the imaging table.
A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 2 and 3 only
D) 2, 3, and 4 only
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: An optimal lateral thoracic vertebrae projection demonstrates
Q4: A left lateral cervicothoracic projection (Twining method)
Q5: A lateral thoracic projection with poor positioning
Q6: For an AP axial cervical projection, the<br>1)mandibular
Q7: A PA axial oblique cervical vertebrae projection
Q9: A lateral cervical projection obtained with the
Q10: An AP axial cervical projection obtained using
Q11: A less than optimal AP axial cervical
Q12: A lateral cervicothoracic projection (Twining method) with
Q13: To obtain open intervertebral disk spaces for