Multiple Choice
A court recently held Acme Corp responsible for spilling pollutants into a stream.Which of the following statements is most likely TRUE?
A) If the court required proof beyond a reasonable doubt,the claim against Acme Corp arose in private law.
B) If the court required proof beyond a reasonable doubt,Acme Corp was called the accused and was prosecuted by the state in criminal or criminal like proceedings.
C) Since Acme Corp is not a human being,the case was heard in a special court called the Commercial Court of Canada.
D) If Acme Corp is dissatisfied with that decision,it is entitled to appeal,but only if it is willing to pay for the other side to bring its witnesses back into court.
E) If the claim against Acme Corp arose in private law,it almost certainly was heard by a jury,as well as a judge.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Makayla was recently served with a statement
Q67: Katrina is a judge in the Manitoba
Q68: Briefly explain the difference between (i)examinations-in-chief and
Q69: A number of commentators have referred to
Q70: A person generally is not entitled to
Q71: Ren,after an interview,feels that he didn't get
Q73: There is no guarantee that things will
Q75: The doctrine of precedent<br>A)prevents a judge from
Q76: Kyle and Jack live in BC and
Q77: At the end of a case,a court