Multiple Choice
Alejandro and Chloe were involved in negotiations for the purchase and sale of her business.She may be held liable for the tort of deceit if
A) she made a prediction about the profitability of the business that was based on income tax returns that she knew contained false information and she communicated that false information in the tax returns to Alejandro deceitfully saying it was true and thus formed a good basis for her prediction.
B) she offered an opinion about the profitability of the business that was based on information that he provided to her.
C) she refused to make a prediction about the profitability of the business even though she had sufficient information with which to do so.
D) she provided accurate information to his lawyer,which the lawyer misinterpreted before advising Alejandro on the sale.
E) she misled Alejandro,even if she did not intend to do so by making an innocent mistake about some of the information concerning the business.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: What is the defence of justification? To
Q26: Bryce consistently commits the tort of nuisance
Q27: Isaac lives next door to Gabrielle.He operates
Q28: Miguel and Caitlin own competing computer software
Q29: A person cannot be held liable for
Q30: The Business Club of Edmonton (BCE)is a
Q34: Briefly explain the difference between the tort
Q35: Dakota sued Mariah for the tort of
Q36: "To succeed in an action for intimidation,the
Q54: Dylan committed the tort of deceit against