Multiple Choice
Jimmy's Trucking Ltd has sued Hoffa Security Inc in tort.Jimmy's accuses Hoffa of committing torts that resulted in substantial economic losses.The evidence indicates that,aside from Jimmy's specific allegations in tort,Hoffa did not act in an unlawful or unauthorized way.The evidence further indicates that while Hoffa's actions were directed toward Jimmy's,Hoffa did not specifically intend to injure Jimmy's economic interests.Hoffa did know about a contract that Jimmy's Trucking had,Hoffa induced a third party to break a contract it had with Jimmy's Trucking and that third party did breach the contract it had with Jimmy's Trucking.Given these facts,Hoffa may be liable for
A) intimidation but not conspiracy.
B) interference with economic relations but not interference with contractual relations.
C) direct inducement to breach of contract,but not indirect inducement to breach of contract.
D) conspiracy but not intimidation.
E) conspiracy but not interference with economic relations.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Johanna was employed by Raouf.Willie caused her
Q9: During recent proceedings,a member of Parliament stood
Q10: Connor and Sierra operated competing garages.Most of
Q11: An action for the tort of nuisance
Q12: Winona has sued Ramon for the tort
Q14: Because Katelyn has a disability,she receives daily
Q15: Jessica was injured while trespassing on Zach's
Q16: Brownie Inc and Chewy Ltd are competitors
Q17: Amarjeet and Doris were competitors in the
Q60: You and I are competitors in the