Essay
Amarjeet and Doris were competitors in the widget industry.In an over-exuberant effort to take over her business, Amarjeet told Doris that he would spread false and unflattering rumours about her unless she sold her company to him.Doris was quite frightened by Amarjeet's behaviour but she did not sell her company to Amarjeet.She has now sued him for the tort of intimidation.Amarjeet has argued in defence that he acted solely for the purpose of furthering his own financial interests, and not out of a desire to hurt Doris.The evidence indicates that he is telling the truth in that respect.He also resists liability on the basis that he never actually did defame Doris as he had threatened to do.Will either of those defences protect Amarjeet from liability? Is there any other basis upon which he can avoid liability? Explain your answers.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Amarjeet cannot avoid liability on the b...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q12: The Northwest Utility Co (NUC) received statutory
Q13: Mohana visited Ian's home.She was injured when
Q14: Sarah made several statements to John.Because he
Q15: Suki used her property in a way
Q16: Brandon intended to start a new company.He
Q18: The tort of conspiracy always requires proof
Q19: Alpha Inc, Beta Inc, and Gamma Inc
Q20: Juan entered into a contract with Makayla,
Q21: Identify and briefly explain the considerations that
Q22: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)Because