Multiple Choice
Preetpal purchased a ticket to ride on a train from Toronto to Ottawa.After she had boarded the train,she was asked if she wished to place her outerwear and backpack into a storage unit on the train.Because she did not want to be encumbered during her journey,she accepted the offer.She was given a "small baggage claims" ticket before handing over her coat and belongings.When the train arrived in Ottawa,and Preetpal tried to collect her coat,she was told that it could not be found.When she threatened to sue,the person who was representing the train told Preetpal that the back of the "small baggage claims" ticket she received excluded liability for lost or stolen goods.Assuming these are the only exclusions,Preetpal can be bound by the exclusion clause only if
A) she actually read it.
B) it was written in a font that was larger than the font that otherwise appeared on the ticket.
C) the clause was written in a language that she can read.
D) it was explained to her when she first bought her train ticket.
E) she was given reasonable notice of the terms on the back of the ticket before or at the time that she received the ticket.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Restitution is always possible for any misrepresentation
Q41: Which of the following cannot result in
Q44: An express term<br>A)is only enforceable if one
Q59: What is meant by the contra proferentum
Q61: A contractual representation relied upon to induce
Q63: Contracts of utmost good faith<br>A)arise when one
Q64: Can an express term ever be overridden
Q64: In what sense might a standard form
Q67: Consumer protection laws in several jurisdictions including
Q68: Cavell is selling his CD burner to