Essay
A purchaser bought an oil painting from a private collector who promised that it was painted by one of the members of the Group of Seven,a promise that was held to be one of the terms of the contract.The painting quickly became the purchasers favourite.He took it home and built a special room for its viewing,with an expensive lighting system.Five years later,after having grown somewhat tired of the room,the purchaser decided to sell the painting.In so doing,he discovered much to his chagrin that the painting was worth much less than he had thought as it was,in fact,done by a less famous American painter,who worked in a style similar to the Group of Seven.The purchaser decided to try to get his money back.He sued the private collector who sold it to him,asking the court to rescind the contract on the ground that there had been an innocent misrepresentation.What are the most plausible grounds upon which the court might decide not to rescind?
Correct Answer:

Verified
The court would likely hold that after f...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q7: Why do insurance contracts require a duty
Q10: Restitution is always possible for any misrepresentation
Q29: Justice Howe, a member of the Supreme
Q30: Parol evidence cannot be used to resolve
Q36: Standard form agreements<br>A)always balance the interests of
Q50: Ranjit purchased a complex computer system from
Q52: A standard form business contract requires independent
Q56: Restitution requires both sides to be returned
Q57: Tyra is looking to buy her first
Q59: Jane was at the international terminal of