True/False
Chuck agreed to sell a widget to Tawny.Under the terms of that contract,she was required to pay $50 000 on May 1 and he was required to deliver the widget to her by June 1.The contract also stated that,regardless of possession,property in the widget would not pass to Tawny until she paid the full price.Tawny failed to pay $50 000 on May 1.However,on May 2,she introduced Chuck to Brandi,who was willing to buy the same widget for $45 000.Chuck insists that Tawny is still required to pay $50 000.Tawny,in contrast,argues that she only has to pay $5000 and that Chuck is required to act reasonably by selling the widget to Brandi for $45 000.Chuck's argument is correct and Tawny's argument is incorrect.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: Although the Sale of Goods Act does
Q55: Elin agreed to buy 100 cartons of
Q57: Cordelia visited Gord's paint store and explained
Q58: Yossuf is a carpenter who manufactures furniture.Among
Q59: Jana entered into an arrangement with Chauds
Q60: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)The
Q62: Noriko saw a painting in Kurosawa's Fine
Q63: Sigmund ordered and ate a meal at
Q64: The phrase nemo dat quod non habet
Q65: Zounds Sounds,a music store,ordered 20 cases of