menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Criminal Justice
  3. Study Set
    Criminal Law
  4. Exam
    Exam 10: Search and Seizure: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
  5. Question
    According to Minnesota V
Solved

According to Minnesota V

Question 17

Question 17

Multiple Choice

According to Minnesota v.Dickerson (1993) ,if a patdown reveals identifiable contraband it may


A) not be seized
B) be seized only with a warrant
C) be seized on the spot
D) be seized only if it was in plain view

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q12: California v.Acevedo declared highway sobriety checkpoints constitutional.

Q13: Hot pursuit<br>A)limits searches to plain view<br>B)allows searches

Q14: Sergeant Wilson was patrolling a local neighborhood

Q15: A _ is an individual who is

Q16: Warrantless searches of vehicles are generally allowed

Q18: The scope of a "Terry" type search

Q19: A vehicle is not subject to search

Q20: Please write a paragraph defining the plain-view

Q21: A search incident to an arrest can

Q22: A person arrested without warrant must be

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines