Solved

With Second-Order Conditioning, You Do Not Need an Unconditioned Stimulus

Question 318

True/False

With second-order conditioning, you do not need an unconditioned stimulus to be physically present in order to learn something about its occurrence.

Related Questions

Q313: The preschool teachers have started putting gold

Q314: We learn our own actions lead to

Q315: Which of the following best fits the

Q316: Hadley was a compulsive gambler who used

Q317: Which theory probably offers the best explanation

Q319: Little Albert was conditioned to fear white

Q320: Frieda used to be afraid of dental

Q321: Daniel is a hunter, and he is

Q322: Observational learning involves:<br>A)trial-and-error<br>B)watching other people<br>C)direct reinforcement and

Q323: Alice developed a fear of the water