Multiple Choice
Over the course of American history,how has the Supreme Court interpreted the interstate commerce clause of Article I,Section 8?
A) The Supreme Court has consistently supported an expansive interpretation of commerce and hence the growth of federal power.
B) The Supreme Court has favored a strict interpretation of interstate commerce,thereby leaving bartering completely unregulated.
C) The Supreme Court has interpreted interstate to mean "between nation-states" and hence not applicable to domestic trade.
D) The Supreme Court was supportive of the federal government early on before limiting the scope of federal power and then consenting to large-scale central regulation of the economy.
E) Early on,the Supreme Court favored a restrictive standard,followed by a broad definition of commerce to crack down on child labor and then a restrictive standard to support the New Deal program.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The necessary and proper clause allowed the
Q23: Limiting government by dividing it into two
Q27: President Obama's no-strings-attached stimulus spending in 2009
Q66: The power delegated by the state to
Q111: How has the national government used grants-in-aid
Q111: According to the _ clause,if a couple
Q117: The system of government in which a
Q119: Grant programs in which a set of
Q120: Morton Grodzins,a noted scholar of federalism,characterized the
Q121: Which clause in the Constitution prevents a