In the Parlato V

Multiple Choice

In the Parlato v.Equitable Life Assurance Society case, the appeals court held:

A) the "public notice rule" was binding under the facts of this case.
B) the principal had a duty to give notice to the third party in this case.
C) that the principal is responsible for torts its agent or former agent commits against unknown third parties because the principal has the ability to select agents.
D) under the circumstances of this case, the agent's apparent authority with regard to the third party terminated along with his actual authority when his employment by Equitable ended.