Multiple Choice
The case of VonHoldt v.Barba & Barba Construction,Inc.held that:
A) the implied warranty of habitability does not include actions against a builder brought by a subsequent purchaser for latent defects in an addition to a home.
B) the plaintiff's complaint should not have been dismissed by the lower court.
C) when a builder makes a significant addition to a previously built home, an action for damages resulting from latent defects affecting habitability exists under the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability.
D) Both (b) and (c) .
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Which of the following are the most
Q7: A restrictive covenant stating that a house
Q12: The debtor who uses real estate to
Q31: Which of the following is NOT essential
Q38: The law of conveyancing firmly establishes that
Q52: An exemption from application of the Fair
Q81: The traditional common law rule regarding the
Q85: There are four major types of deeds.
Q87: The Fair Housing Act is Title VIII
Q88: Title insurance policies may be issued to