Matching
Match the Supreme Court case to its ruling.
Premises:
Graham v. Florida
In re Winship
In re Gault
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Schall v. Martin
Breed v. Jones
Kent v. U.S.
Safford v. Redding
Roper v. Simmons
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Responses:
No life-without-parole sentences for juveniles when death did not occur
Preventive detention for juveniles is permitted
Delinquency adjudication requires proof beyond reasonable doubt
Courts must consider a child’s age during interrogations for purposes of Miranda warning
Rights to notification of charges, counsel, cross-examination, and protection from self-incrimination
Juveniles do not have right to trial by jury
Referrals of juveniles to criminal court require a hearing, assistance of counsel, and a statement of reasons
Probable cause not needed for school searches
Strip search of student without showing of a clear danger to other students violates the Fourth Amendment
Juveniles have protection against double jeopardy
No death penalty for those under age eighteen
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
Graham v. Florida
In re Winship
In re Gault
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Schall v. Martin
Breed v. Jones
Kent v. U.S.
Safford v. Redding
Roper v. Simmons
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Premises:
Graham v. Florida
In re Winship
In re Gault
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Schall v. Martin
Breed v. Jones
Kent v. U.S.
Safford v. Redding
Roper v. Simmons
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Responses:
Related Questions
Q1: It is evident from the data that
Q2: Most cases requiring court interpretation of the
Q3: A criminal act committed by a person
Q5: A _ long-term non-secure setting for adjudicated
Q6: A juvenile's _ is similar to an
Q7: Despite the overall decline in the number
Q8: A _ is a short-term facility that
Q9: What factors do you think are involved
Q10: Arrests are not an accurate indicator of
Q11: The establishment of juvenile courts corresponded with