Solved

Parol Evidence Generally Is Admissible to Explain

Question 54

Multiple Choice

Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:

A) ambiguous terms.
B) why signatures are missing.
C) why a contract was not performed.
D) implied terms.

Related Questions

Q49: In the absence of a statute requiring

Q50: The parol evidence rule does not apply

Q51: An oral contract containing a promise by

Q52: A court can imply details of a

Q53: A father's handshake and oral promise to

Q55: Under the majority view, a contract that

Q56: Parol evidence is not admissible to show

Q57: Through incorporation by deference, a contract can

Q58: When persons enter into an agreement, it

Q59: Under the statute of frauds, an oral