In Gaskin V.Stumm Handel GmbH,the District Court Ruled

Multiple Choice

In Gaskin v.Stumm Handel GmbH,the District Court ruled:

A) That employment contracts must be in writing.
B) That the plaintiff was excused from performing a contract written in German because he understood only English.
C) That the contract was unconscionable because it was written in a language foreign to the plaintiff.
D) That the plaintiff's failure to speak or read German was not grounds for invalidating an employment contract written in that language.