If a Stroke Patient Was Better at Answering Abstract Conditional

Multiple Choice

If a stroke patient was better at answering abstract conditional logic questions that evaluate rule violations than at answering equivalent logic questions that evaluate rule violations involving people, this would indicate that the person's stroke most likely had

A) nonspecifically compromised the patient's problem-solving abilities.
B) specifically affected the patient's brain system attuned to social contract violations.
C) not affected any brain systems involved with solving either of these types of problems.
D) compromised the patient's Theory of Mind capabilities.