Multiple Choice
Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its waste "for free" by dumping it into a nearby river. While the firm benefits from dumping waste into the river, the waste reduces fish and bird reproduction. This causes damage to local fishermen and bird watchers. At a cost, Erie Textiles can filter out the toxins, in which case local fishermen and bird watchers will not suffer any damage. The relevant gains and losses (in thousands of dollars) for the three parties are listed below.
Suppose that Erie Textiles can only negotiate with one of the affected groups. Will Erie operate with a filter?
A) Yes, if they negotiate with the Bird Watchers, but not if they negotiate with the Fishermen.
B) No, regardless of which group they negotiate with.
C) Yes, if they negotiate with the Fishermen, but not if they negotiate with the Bird Watchers.
D) Yes, regardless of which group they negotiate with.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q146: Suppose there are ten people playing cards
Q147: If the equilibrium quantity is equal to
Q148: When Brady is driving he throws his
Q149: Refer to the figure below. Private incentives
Q150: If the marginal cost of reducing pollution
Q152: Compared to a fixed percentage reduction regulation,
Q153: The optimal quantity of a negative externality
Q154: Compared to taxing pollution, an advantage of
Q155: The Coase theorem states that if private
Q156: Suppose there are three power-generating plants, each