Multiple Choice
Moscovitch and Moscovitch (2000) compared prosopagnosic patients and object-agnosic patients.What did they find?
A) There were no differences between the two patient types.
B) Patients with object agnosia were normal at face recognition but showed deficits in object recognition.Prosopagnosic patients showed deficits in facial recognition but not object recognition.
C) Object-agnosic patients show deficits in all stimuli, whereas the prosopagnosic agnostic patients showed deficits only in recognizing faces and had normal responses to all other stimuli.
D) The prosopagnosic agnostic patients recovered more quickly than did the object-agnosic patients.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: The perception of a physically absent but
Q24: You encounter four battery-powered toys moving in
Q25: V4 is an area of the brain
Q26: Compare and contrast the fusiform face area
Q27: Gestalt psychology is primarily concerned with answering
Q29: Looser and Wheatley (2010) compared the responses
Q30: What are geons?<br>A)viruses that affect visual perception<br>B)objects
Q31: An area of the occipital lobe involved
Q32: Identifying a new style of bicycle as
Q33: Grouping and segregation are processes in perceptual