Multiple Choice
A study by Charles and Mary Brown has documented a reduction in the wing length of cliff swallows that live near busy roadways; the study proposes that the need to avoid being hit by cars is the evolutionary driving force for the change.How would you evaluate this hypothesis if wing length had also shortened in cliff swallow populations that live in the desert Southwest where traffic is virtually nonexistent?
A) The hypothesis would still be valid. Natural selection is driven by local conditions; the two populations are probably evolving independently and they have coincidentally acquired the same characteristics.
B) The hypothesis would raise some doubts; perhaps aerial predators or another factor yet to be identified are creating the necessity for better flying skills in both populations.
C) The hypothesis would not be valid, because the probability of the same wing length mutation arising in geographically distinct populations is extremely low.
D) The hypothesis would not be valid; if the need to avoid vehicular collisions is driving natural selection, then no evolution should be occurring in the population that lives in the traffic-free environment.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: Continental drift predicts that fossils of species
Q37: Some finches on the Galápagos Islands feed
Q38: When scientists use the phrase theory of
Q39: Some highly successful biologists also have a
Q40: One result of _ over evolutionary time
Q42: Humans have a reduced tailbone and the
Q43: In genetic drift,the events that affect the
Q44: The fossils of organisms that existed when
Q45: Evolution is<br>A) not supported by scientific evidence.<br>B)
Q46: Natural selection tends to<br>A) increase the commonality