In the Early Twenty-First Century,Serena Writes a Research Ethics Paper

Multiple Choice

In the early twenty-first century,Serena writes a research ethics paper about the legacy of Philip Zimbardo.She considers his work and reputation over the 40 years since the Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) and concludes he was

A) an evil researcher whose credential should have been stripped,because no one should make an error such as he did.
B) a good researcher who recognized his mistake,and continued to work for decades on understanding authority and abuse.
C) a stubborn researcher who continued running prison experiments without oversight or IRB approval,despite the disapproval of his sociology peers.
D) simply following the norms of the time,and ethical breaches such as the harm to subjects in this study could not become apparent until years later.