Multiple Choice
Mike worked for Frank's Pizza as a driver and was an agent.His duties consisted of making deliveries along a designated route.One day Mike decided to see his girlfriend,Jackie,who lived 50 miles off his pizza route.While driving to his girlfriend's,Mike injured a pedestrian,Chuck.The accident was caused by Mike's negligent driving.Chuck is now suing both Mike and Frank's for personal injuries.Under the circumstances
A) Frank's is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
B) Frank's is never liable for the negligent torts of its agents.
C) Chuck can recover damages from both Frank's and Mike.
D) Frank's is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: Tom has been injured on the job,so
Q21: Which of the following is an example
Q22: A principal has a duty to reimburse
Q23: In an agency relationship the principal's control
Q24: If an agent suffers losses while acting
Q26: Which of the following is a true
Q27: Respondeat superior makes a principal liable for<br>A)
Q28: Mike calls Beth and asks her to
Q29: Agency law primarily exists on the<br>A) state
Q30: Explain the three-prong test the IRS uses