Multiple Choice
Ginger owns a business that is comprehensively regulated by a federal agency.One day,a federal inspector arrives at Ginger's business without advance warning and begins to conduct a search,taking several samples of some products Ginger is manufacturing.Ginger claims this is a violation of her constitutional rights.How would a court likely rule?
A) A court is unlikely to hear the case at all because actions of federal agencies are not subject to judicial review.
B) Although agencies can conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances,they cannot do so if a business is comprehensively regulated.
C) Because the business is comprehensively regulated,a court will assume that Ginger knows that her business is subject to periodic,unannounced inspections.
D) A court will agree that the agency violated Ginger's rights because the Fourth Amendment states that the right of the people to be secure in their persons,houses,papers,and effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Psychologist Holtz is working with a patient,Rebecca,who
Q5: The Civil Rights Act of 1964,a federal
Q6: Common law,like statutory law,is prospective.
Q7: The largest source of new law comes
Q8: The purpose of the Freedom of Information
Q10: A subpoena duces tecum is different from
Q11: Discuss the four most important limitations on
Q12: Even if a statute's words have ordinary,everyday
Q13: While at the park,Tasha saw a small
Q14: Administrative agencies exist at the federal,state,and local