Multiple Choice
Wayne worked in an office.He had no criminal record,had never had a complaint made against him about his work or his conduct,and had been a faithful employee for nearly 20 years.One day,Wayne followed his supervisor to his home and fatally shot him.The estate of the supervisor sued the company,claiming it should have been aware of Wayne's growing frustration with work.The company's best defense will be that
A) there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
B) the incident occurred away from the office.
C) the killing was the result of a personal conflict between Wayne and the supervisor.
D) even if the company had been aware of Wayne's difficulty with his supervisor,Wayne did not have any criminal history.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: The test of "foreseeability" is generally used
Q24: While hunting,Roger enters Adele's property without permission
Q25: To establish res ipsa loquitur in most
Q26: Negligence concerns harm that<br>A)is unforeseeable.<br>B)arises intentionally.<br>C)arises by
Q27: As it applies to landowners,which of the
Q29: Don was driving his truck when a
Q30: Annette drove through an intersection without looking
Q31: The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed
Q32: A plaintiff sues in negligence but has
Q33: In a strict liability case,the courts still